Supporting healing, empowerment & growth:​ An evaluation of the Recovery Options program

Uniting WA engaged the Centre for Social Impact UWA to conduct an independent evaluation of Recovery Options, a community-based mental health program that provides psychosocial support through two streams:

  • 3-month rapid response support for those with unmet needs, a pilot developed in response to an extensive waitlist and evolving needs due to the cost-of-living crisis
  • 6-18-month psychosocial support for those who require intensive, recovery-oriented support.
Client Journey - Recovery Options

The research sought to understand whether RO is making a meaningful difference for participants, identify areas for improvement, and uncover the systemic factors impacting recovery. Using a mixed-methods approach with recovery-oriented principles, the evaluation aims to inform better practice and drive sector-wide learning.

Key findings

  • Relational support is foundational: strong relationships built trust and enabled progress.
  • Individual progress matters: success reflected personal goals, not clinical measures.
  • Autonomy and choice are highly valued: person-led support is seen as empowering.
  • Distress has social context: housing and cost-of-living pressure drives mental health needs.
  • Discharge is complex: endings often felt abrupt and emotionally challenging.
  • Strong sector relationships are critical: for seamless referrals and collaborative care.

Recommendations

  • Increase flexible funding to sustain holistic, person-led support.
  • Centre choice & control by keeping care responsive and empowering.
  • Support exit transitions with co-designed plans and warm referrals.
  • Embed peer and community connection early to reduce isolation.
  • Resource goal-setting so mentors can support practical, personal goals.
  • Strengthen collaboration with peer workers and community groups.
  • Improve data and consent for better measurement and coordinated care.
Recovery Options: Participants significantly improved their ability to meet key needs.

Fewer people were experiencing very high levels of distress, dropping from 58% at the start to 40% when they finished the program.

On exit, 2 out of 3 participants felt better able to:

  • Manage their mental wellbeing
  • Recognise early signs that may impact their wellbeing
  • Have strategies or seek support when needed